Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Win. Important Refugee case – Protection visa
Another very important win for AR LAW SERVICES: Master Migration & Regulatory Lawyers and justice – Big win Safe Haven Enterprise Visa – Subclass 790 – Appeal from the Tribunal – Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) – to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. Won on the papers.
A Kurdish family of an ethnicity with Kowli ancestry arrived in Australia by boat and applied for asylum.
In 2017 they applied for a Safe Haven Enterprise Visa – Subclass 790, it was refused they then appeal to the Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA).
This appeal to the Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) was also unsuccessful. It was at this time that AR LAW SERVICES became involved.
Following the IAA appeal being refused their sponsoring church brought them to me to appeal the matter to the Federal Circuit Court.
As often happens I am retained by other law firms and migration agents to assist with difficult cases; like a solicitor briefs a barrister or a Silk (now KCs) lawyers and migration agents instruct me.
And, I am happy to say the Minister has agreed with my submission and has consented to the following:
IN THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
REGISTRY: MELBOURNE
FILE NUMBER MLG2066/2020
CSP20
First Applicant
CSQ20
Second Applicant
CSR20
Third Applicant
CSS20
Fourth Applicant
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT
SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
First Respondent
IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY
Second Respondent
CONSENT ORDER
We consent, for the purposes of Rule 13.08 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)(General Federal Law) Rules 2021, to the making of orders in the
following terms:
1. The name of the first respondent be amended to ‘Minister for Immigration, Citizenship
and Multicultural Affairs’.
2. A writ in the nature of certiorari issue directed to the second respondent quashing the
decision dated 22 May 2020 (IAA20/8222, IAA20/8223, IAA20/8224 and IAA20/8225).
3. A writ of mandamus issue directed to the second respondent requiring review of the
first respondent’s decision dated 9 April 2020 to be determined according to law.
4. The first respondent pay the applicants’ costs fixed
This is such a satisfying win, for many reasons not least because by the Minister capitulating and agreeing with my argument, my clients were spared the trauma and expense of going to Court. Thereby, not only did they(my clients) not have to pay costs, but the Minister (that is the Department of Immigration) paid the significant Costs to my client.
So if you have a complex case – refusal or cancelation of a visa or citizenship – or if you have a matter currently before the Tribunal – AAT/IAA or Federal Court and need a second opinion or more extensive assist – talk to us!
Onshore Protection Visa & Refugee visa – sub class 866
AR LAW SERVICES: Master Migration Lawyers has been helping win difficult refugee or protection visa cases of over 20 years – we can help you with your Onshore Protection Visa. We are Master Migration & Refugee Lawyers and we can assist in all relevant paperwork and in helping with the preparation for your protection visa interview.
Many of our protection visa clients are international students and tourists who fear to return to their home country and would like to stay in Australia permanently. AR LAW SERVICES has a proven success record in assisting nationals of China, Pakistan, India, Fiji, Malaysia, Iran, Nepal, Mauritius, Afghanistan, Egypt, Sri Lanka and many other countries.
Another “David and Goliath” refugee case won by AR LAW Services at the AAT.
Refugee Case: Big win for AR LAW Service. A Shia woman from Pakistan: an Hazara.
If you or some one you know feels they did not get what they paid for – feel cheated – talk to us
If you or some one you know feels they did not get what they paid for – feel cheated – talk to us
If you or some one you know feels they did not get what they paid for – feel cheated – talk to us
