<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bogus Documents Archives - AR Law</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/tag/bogus-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.arlaw.com.au/tag/bogus-documents/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2023 06:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Bogus documents &#8211; PIC 4020- PIC &#8211; Public Interest Criteria (PIC) 4020  Waiver in false &#038; misleading: Fraud Cases</title>
		<link>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-pic-4020-pic-public-interest-criteria-pic-4020-waiver-in-false-misleading-fraud-cases/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2023 06:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Documents]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.arlaw.com.au/?p=7279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Bogus documents &#8211; PIC 4020- PIC &#8211; Public Interest Criteria (PIC) 4020 Waiver in false &#38; misleading: Fraud Cases The Law: Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4020 allows the Minister to refuse a visa if: An applicant provides bogus documents or information that is false or misleading in relation to visa application or visa held in&#8230;&#160;<a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-pic-4020-pic-public-interest-criteria-pic-4020-waiver-in-false-misleading-fraud-cases/" class="" rel="bookmark">Read More &#187;<span class="screen-reader-text">Bogus documents &#8211; PIC 4020- PIC &#8211; Public Interest Criteria (PIC) 4020  Waiver in false &#038; misleading: Fraud Cases</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-pic-4020-pic-public-interest-criteria-pic-4020-waiver-in-false-misleading-fraud-cases/">Bogus documents &#8211; PIC 4020- PIC &#8211; Public Interest Criteria (PIC) 4020  Waiver in false &#038; misleading: Fraud Cases</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au">AR Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice won at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal &#8211; AAT. Cancelled Protection Visa/Refugee status restored: Bogus Document Case.</title>
		<link>https://www.arlaw.com.au/justice-at-the-aat-cancelled-protection-visa-restored-bogus-document-case/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAT appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Appeal Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Appeal Tribunal AAT MRT RRT Federal & High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Protection Visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancelled refugee visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancelled visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancelled visa appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit court visa appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration solicitors.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection visa cancellation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.arlaw.com.au/?p=5992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Administrative Appeals Tribunal &#8211; AAT. Cancelled Protection Visa/Refugee In late 2019 I was approached by a person whose protection visa had been cancelled pursuant to s109 of the Migration act. The department granted the visa: that is, found him to be a person Australia owed protection, ie he was a Refugee, (His history was truly&#8230;&#160;<a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/justice-at-the-aat-cancelled-protection-visa-restored-bogus-document-case/" class="" rel="bookmark">Read More &#187;<span class="screen-reader-text">Justice won at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal &#8211; AAT. Cancelled Protection Visa/Refugee status restored: Bogus Document Case.</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/justice-at-the-aat-cancelled-protection-visa-restored-bogus-document-case/">Justice won at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal &#8211; AAT. Cancelled Protection Visa/Refugee status restored: Bogus Document Case.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au">AR Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PIC 4007 Visa Refusal Appeal &#8211; Justice for Partner Visa Case. AR LAW Services Another AAT Health Waiver Case Win.</title>
		<link>https://www.arlaw.com.au/pic-4007-visa-refusal-appeal-justice-for-partner-visa-case-ar-law-services-another-aat-health-waiver-case-win/</link>
					<comments>https://www.arlaw.com.au/pic-4007-visa-refusal-appeal-justice-for-partner-visa-case-ar-law-services-another-aat-health-waiver-case-win/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 02:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[457 visa applications appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAT appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAT visa refusal appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Appeal Tribunal AAT MRT RRT Federal & High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Appeals Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austalian visa applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian immigration lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Migration law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal court appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV Health Waiver VIsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner visa refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIC 4007 Health Waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIC 4020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s501]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa cancellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa refusal visa cancellation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.arlaw.com.au/?p=4312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As readers of this post will note I regularly appear at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and Federal Court. Much of that work has to do with Health or Character cases: PIC 4007 or 4020 Bogus documents or Cancellation or Refusal pursuant to s501 or s116. This case is to do with a Health waiver&#8230;&#160;<a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/pic-4007-visa-refusal-appeal-justice-for-partner-visa-case-ar-law-services-another-aat-health-waiver-case-win/" class="" rel="bookmark">Read More &#187;<span class="screen-reader-text">PIC 4007 Visa Refusal Appeal &#8211; Justice for Partner Visa Case. AR LAW Services Another AAT Health Waiver Case Win.</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/pic-4007-visa-refusal-appeal-justice-for-partner-visa-case-ar-law-services-another-aat-health-waiver-case-win/">PIC 4007 Visa Refusal Appeal &#8211; Justice for Partner Visa Case. AR LAW Services Another AAT Health Waiver Case Win.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au">AR Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.arlaw.com.au/pic-4007-visa-refusal-appeal-justice-for-partner-visa-case-ar-law-services-another-aat-health-waiver-case-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bogus Documents. PIC 4020. Visa refusal. Big Win at the AAT. (The Administrative Appeals Tribunal)</title>
		<link>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-4020-visa-refusal-big-win-at-the-aat/</link>
					<comments>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-4020-visa-refusal-big-win-at-the-aat/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2019 05:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4020 visa refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[457]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian visa lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Court Visa appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa lawyer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.arlaw.com.au/?p=4291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently AR LAW Services were approached to assist with an appeal for a refused 457 visa (A sponsored work visa). due to alleged &#8220;bogus documents&#8221; being submitted and the consequential breach of PIC 4020. The client had been &#8220;assisted&#8221; by two different migration agents. Compensation Law Not only did both migration agents not HELP but&#8230;&#160;<a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-4020-visa-refusal-big-win-at-the-aat/" class="" rel="bookmark">Read More &#187;<span class="screen-reader-text">Bogus Documents. PIC 4020. Visa refusal. Big Win at the AAT. (The Administrative Appeals Tribunal)</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-4020-visa-refusal-big-win-at-the-aat/">Bogus Documents. PIC 4020. Visa refusal. Big Win at the AAT. (The Administrative Appeals Tribunal)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au">AR Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-4020-visa-refusal-big-win-at-the-aat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bogus Documents:  AR LAW wins Another AAT PIC 4020 &#8220;visa refusal&#8221; Appeal Case.</title>
		<link>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-ar-law-wins-another-aat-pic-4020-visa-refusal-appeal-case/</link>
					<comments>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-ar-law-wins-another-aat-pic-4020-visa-refusal-appeal-case/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 03:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Appeals Tribunal Migration PIC 4020 appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATT Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIC 4020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa refusal PIC 4020]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.arlaw.com.au/?p=4164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A young professional&#8217;s life had been destroyed by a departmental decision to refuse to grant a skilled 189 visa pursuant to PIC 4020: not only did the department refuse the skilled visa application but as a direct consequence the applicant&#8217;s marriage failed &#8211; ending in divorce. So by the time the applicant found AR LAW&#8230;&#160;<a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-ar-law-wins-another-aat-pic-4020-visa-refusal-appeal-case/" class="" rel="bookmark">Read More &#187;<span class="screen-reader-text">Bogus Documents:  AR LAW wins Another AAT PIC 4020 &#8220;visa refusal&#8221; Appeal Case.</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-ar-law-wins-another-aat-pic-4020-visa-refusal-appeal-case/">Bogus Documents:  AR LAW wins Another AAT PIC 4020 &#8220;visa refusal&#8221; Appeal Case.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au">AR Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-ar-law-wins-another-aat-pic-4020-visa-refusal-appeal-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AR LAW Services wins another important AAT case: PIC 4020, visa refusal for &#8216;Bogus&#8217; documents: how the wrap got beat!</title>
		<link>https://www.arlaw.com.au/ar-law-services-wins-another-important-aat-appeal-pic-4020-the-outlook-was-bleak/</link>
					<comments>https://www.arlaw.com.au/ar-law-services-wins-another-important-aat-appeal-pic-4020-the-outlook-was-bleak/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Australian Visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAT appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Appeals Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus work history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false and misleading visa application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity PIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIC 4020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa refusal PIC 4020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa rejection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.arlaw.com.au/?p=4035</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PIC 4020 &#8211; the integrity or &#8220;fraud&#8221; criteria following the recent Federal Court Case of &#8220;Singh&#8221; &#8211; the strict liability case &#8211; (Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC) which in turn followed on from &#8220;Trivedi&#8217;s&#8221; case (Trivedi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 42), the outlook for visa&#8230;&#160;<a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/ar-law-services-wins-another-important-aat-appeal-pic-4020-the-outlook-was-bleak/" class="" rel="bookmark">Read More &#187;<span class="screen-reader-text">AR LAW Services wins another important AAT case: PIC 4020, visa refusal for &#8216;Bogus&#8217; documents: how the wrap got beat!</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/ar-law-services-wins-another-important-aat-appeal-pic-4020-the-outlook-was-bleak/">AR LAW Services wins another important AAT case: PIC 4020, visa refusal for &#8216;Bogus&#8217; documents: how the wrap got beat!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au">AR Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.arlaw.com.au/ar-law-services-wins-another-important-aat-appeal-pic-4020-the-outlook-was-bleak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bogus Documents &#8211; PIC 4020: Fed Court says Strict, Absolutely!</title>
		<link>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-pic-4020-fed-court-says-strict-absolutely/</link>
					<comments>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-pic-4020-fed-court-says-strict-absolutely/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 06:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Australian Visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIC 4020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa refusal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arlaw.com.au/?p=3862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the recent decision of   Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) FCAFC 52 (5 April 2018) The Court held that: “it was open to the AAT to find that the applicant had, at the very least, caused the bogus document (or false and misleading information) to be given to the Department&#8230;&#160;<a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-pic-4020-fed-court-says-strict-absolutely/" class="" rel="bookmark">Read More &#187;<span class="screen-reader-text">Bogus Documents &#8211; PIC 4020: Fed Court says Strict, Absolutely!</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-pic-4020-fed-court-says-strict-absolutely/">Bogus Documents &#8211; PIC 4020: Fed Court says Strict, Absolutely!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.arlaw.com.au">AR Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.arlaw.com.au/bogus-documents-pic-4020-fed-court-says-strict-absolutely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
